neuroglympse

Published trial data

What the evidence actually shows, marker by marker

Four proteins, each measuring something different, each with its own evidence base and its own limits. Below each one, in plain language: what it changes for you.

Marker by marker

The four proteins, and what each one is for

A brain injury damages different cell types, and each releases a different protein on a different clock. That is why a panel exists at all rather than a single test.

Marker 01

GFAP

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

Where it comes from
Astrocytes — the support cells that hold brain tissue together and maintain the blood–brain barrier.
When it is useful
Rises within hours. Best evidence is on the day of injury.

GFAP is the headline marker of the FDA-cleared panel, and it has the strongest trial behind it of anything on this page. In ALERT-TBI, a prospective study across multiple centres, 1,959 adults arriving at emergency departments after head trauma had blood drawn within 12 hours and a CT scan performed. Combined with UCH-L1 at preset thresholds, the test detected intracranial injury with a sensitivity of 97.6% and a negative predictive value of 99.6%.1

The negative predictive value is the number that matters. Of the 1,959 patients, 671 tested negative — and in only three of the whole cohort was the CT positive when the test was negative.1 That is what the clearance is for: ruling out the need for a scan. Note also who paid for it. The trial was funded by the assay’s manufacturer, which does not make the result wrong, but is the kind of thing you are entitled to know.

What this means for you

A negative result means it is very unlikely — about 996 times in 1,000 — that you have bleeding or bruising a CT would find. That can mean no scan, no radiation dose, and no evening in a waiting room.

It does not mean you do not have a concussion. A concussion can be entirely real, and disabling, with a perfectly clean scan. This test answers “is something bleeding?”, not “are you injured?”

Marker 02

UCH-L1

Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1

Where it comes from
Neurons themselves — it is one of the most abundant proteins inside a nerve cell body.
When it is useful
Rises and clears fastest of all four. Essentially a same-day marker.

GFAP comes from support cells; UCH-L1 comes from the neurons. Running them together is what lets the panel see two different kinds of damage at once, and they were validated together in ALERT-TBI at a threshold of 327 pg/mL.1 The paired assay is cleared to detect intracranial injury after mild TBI, reported at 96.7% sensitivity and 99.4% negative predictive value in the labelling.7

Its weakness is the clock. UCH-L1 clears quickly, and in patients followed beyond the acute window it showed only weak associations with injury severity and with what imaging showed.3 If you are reading this weeks after a fall, this is not your marker.

What this means for you

Two markers instead of one means one draw looks at two kinds of damage: the brain’s support cells and the nerve cells themselves.

The practical part is timing. This marker fades fast. Drawn today after an injury today, it is informative. Drawn three weeks later it will likely read normal whether or not you were hurt — so if your injury is not recent, we will not lean on it, and we will tell you that rather than bill you for it.

Marker 03

S100B

S100 calcium-binding protein B

Where it comes from
Astrocytes, like GFAP — but also fat, bone, cartilage and muscle outside the brain.
When it is useful
Peaks around day 1, back near baseline within about two weeks.

S100B has the longest clinical track record of the four. Scandinavian national guidelines build it directly into who gets a CT: in a defined low-risk group, a value below 0.10 µg/L drawn within 6 hours of the injury allows discharge without a scan at all.4

The same guideline is blunt about its limits, and so are we. S100B is clinically unspecific, has a short half-life, and is unsuitable both for patients with injuries elsewhere on the body and for anyone arriving more than six hours after the trauma.4 Because it is also released by bone, fat and muscle, a broken bone or heavy exertion can raise it with no brain injury at all — and head-to-head against NF-L in sports concussion, it came off worse.6 It peaks around day 1 and drifts back toward normal over the following one to two weeks.5

What this means for you

Drawn in the right window, a low S100B can be enough to safely skip a CT scan altogether.

But if you also broke a bone, or you arrive the next day, this number can mislead — raised for reasons that have nothing to do with your head, or already back to normal despite a real injury. That is exactly why we ask when you were hurt and what else was hurt. Those two answers change which result we trust.

Marker 04

NF-L

Neurofilament light chain

Where it comes from
Axons — the long fibres that carry signals between brain regions. It is released when those fibres are damaged.
When it is useful
The late marker. Still informative months, even years, after injury.

NF-L is the one that changes what is possible for people whose injury was not last week. In a cohort followed for five years, serum NF-L fell steadily but remained significantly elevated against controls throughout.3 At 30 days after injury it separated mild, moderate and severe TBI from uninjured controls with AUROCs of 0.84, 0.92 and 0.92.3

It was also the only marker of the four that tracked with the rate of brain atrophy on MRI and with the progression of axonal injury on diffusion imaging.3 The authors’ conclusion is direct: for subacute and chronic TBI, NF-L has greater diagnostic and prognostic utility than GFAP, tau or UCH-L1.3 Serial sampling shows why the timing matters so much — plasma NF-L ran roughly 483-fold above baseline at day 2, 89-fold at day 9, and still around 3-fold at day 176.5

What this means for you

This is the marker for people who were told “it is just a concussion” months ago and never got back to normal.

Long after the others have gone quiet, NF-L can still show that the wiring between brain regions took damage. If your fall was last spring, this is the one that can still say something — and it is the reason a late test is worth doing at all rather than being told you have missed the window.

The honest limit

What none of these markers can tell you

This is the finding that shapes how we practise, and it is the one most likely to be left off a page like this.

The TRACK-TBI investigators followed 1,696 patients and asked what a blood sample taken on the day of injury could predict six months later. For the severe end — death, or a badly unfavourable outcome — the markers did well: GFAP reached an AUC of 0.87 for predicting death and UCH-L1 0.89.2

For incomplete recovery — still not back to your old self at six months — the same markers reached only 0.62 and 0.61.2 That is close to uninformative. And incomplete recovery was not the rare outcome: 1,135 of those 1,696 patients, 66.9%, had not fully recovered at six months.2

Read those two facts together. The most common outcome after a brain injury is the one a blood test on day one is worst at predicting — and the markers perform better in seriously injured patients than in the mild ones this site is mostly about.2 The genetic picture is no different: APOE ε4 shifts group-level odds of a favourable outcome modestly,9 and in the mild-TBI studies specifically the association was judged non-contributory more often than not.10

What this means for you

A blood test can tell you, fast and with real confidence, whether you have the kind of bleeding or bruising that needs a scan tonight. It is genuinely good at that.

It cannot tell you whether you will still have headaches in March. Nobody’s blood test can — that is what the numbers above actually say.

So the useful question is not which single test settles this, because none of them does. It is what do we measure, and how often, to catch it if you are not recovering. That is a functional measurement you can repeat, and monitoring between appointments — which is the entire reason our care model is built the way it is, rather than ending at a result.

Putting it together

Why a panel, read as a whole

Different cells, different proteins

GFAP and S100B come from support cells, UCH-L1 from neurons, NF-L from axons. An injury that shows in one may not show in another.

Different clocks

Hours for UCH-L1, a day for S100B, months for NF-L. The interval since your injury decides which markers can say anything at all.

Read alongside, never alone

Guidance on integrating these markers treats them as one input to a clinical assessment.8 A normal panel does not rule out a concussion.

References

Every figure on this page is linked to the study it came from, with the design and sample size stated so you can judge the weight it carries. Where a trial was funded by a manufacturer, we say so on the page.

  1. 1.Bazarian JJ, Biberthaler P, Welch RD, Lewis LM, Barzo P, Bogner-Flatz V, Brolinson PG, Büki A, Chen JY, Christenson RH, et al.. Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for prediction of absence of intracranial injuries on head CT (ALERT-TBI): a multicentre observational study. The Lancet Neurology. 2018;17(9):782–789.
  2. 2.Korley FK, Jain S, Sun X, Puccio AM, Yue JK, Gardner RC, Wang KKW, Okonkwo DO, Yuh EL, Mukherjee P, Nelson LD, Taylor SR, Markowitz AJ, Diaz-Arrastia R, Manley GT; TRACK-TBI Investigators. Prognostic value of day-of-injury plasma GFAP and UCH-L1 concentrations for predicting functional recovery after traumatic brain injury in patients from the US TRACK-TBI cohort: an observational cohort study. The Lancet Neurology. 2022;21(9):803–813.
  3. 3.Shahim P, Politis A, van der Merwe A, Moore B, Ekanayake V, Lippa SM, Chou YY, Pham DL, Butman JA, Diaz-Arrastia R, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Gill JM, Brody DL, Chan L. Time course and diagnostic utility of NfL, tau, GFAP, and UCH-L1 in subacute and chronic TBI. Neurology. 2020;95(6):e623–e636.
  4. 4.Undén J, Ingebrigtsen T, Romner B; Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee. Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild and moderate head injuries in adults: an evidence and consensus-based update. BMC Medicine. 2013;11:50.
  5. 5.Systematic review. Serial sampling of serum protein biomarkers for monitoring human traumatic brain injury dynamics. Frontiers in Neurology.
  6. 6.Shahim P, et al.. Neurofilament light and tau as blood biomarkers for sports-related concussion. Neurology. 2018.
  7. 7.American Family Physician review. UCH-L1 and GFAP testing (i-STAT TBI Plasma) for the detection of intracranial injury following mild traumatic brain injury. American Family Physician. 2022;105(3):313.
  8. 8.Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine. Test selection and clinical integration of blood-based biomarkers for mild traumatic brain injury. ADLM Scientific Shorts. 2025.
  9. 9.McFadyen CA, Zeiler FA, Newcombe V, Synnot A, Steyerberg E, Gruen RL, Rosand J, Palotie A, Maas AIR, Menon DK. Apolipoprotein E4 polymorphism and outcomes from traumatic brain injury: a living systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2021;38(8):1124–1136.
  10. 10.Lawrence DW, Comper P, Hutchison MG, Sharma B. The role of apolipoprotein E epsilon-4 allele on outcome following traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Injury. 2015;29(9):1018–1031.

This page is educational and is not medical advice. Prevalence figures are presented as the source reports them, including confidence intervals and ranges; a single number would imply more precision than the evidence supports.

Talk it through with our team

Bring your questions about any of this. The interval since your injury decides which of these markers is worth drawing at all, and that is a five-minute conversation.

Call usEnroll a patient